REPORT: Alleged violations of Nike’s Code of Conduct at Nike’s PT Sinar Timur Industrindo factory in Indonesia

January 24th, 2012
Jim Keady with SPN Committee Members at Nike's PT Sinar Timur factory
Jim Keady with SPN Committee Members at Nike’s PT Sinar Timur factory

EFJ/Team Sweat:

I just submitted the following report to Nike CEO, Mark Parker. I will keep you posted as this case moves forward.

Peace,

Jim Keady, Director
Educating for Justice
**********************

Dear Mark,

I am writing with regard to PT Sinar Timur Industrindo, a Nike supplier located at Jalan Raya Serang KM 25,6 Cisereh Tigaraksa Tangerang Banten, Indonesia. PT Sinar Timur Industrindo produces Nike’s injection pylons for Nike’s PT Pratama and PT Nikomas factories. On January 11, 2011, I had a meeting with the local committee of the Serikat Perkerja Nasional (SPN) and approximately twenty-five additional workers from the factory. During this meeting, I documented a number of serious violations of Nike’s Code of Conduct. I have outlined the allegations below, along with a suggested plan of action for each item.

Can you please provide me an acknowledgement that you have received this and also provide details by January 30, 2012 on how you will address each of the items below?

Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. I look forward to hearing back from you.

Peace,

Jim Keady, Director
Educating for Justice, Inc.

COMPLAINT: JAM MOLOR
The union reports that, like their colleagues at PT Nikomas, they too have been subjected to the practice of “jam molor” – being forced to work overtime without pay. They shared that this happens regularly at the factory.

DEMAND: JAM MOLOR
Immediately contract AKATIGA Bandung to conduct an investigation into this matter, similar to the investigation they conducted at PT Nikomas. Only this time, unlike the process at Nikomas, please be sure that the management does not conduct an intimidation campaign that pushes workers to lie about the actual amount of overtime hours worked without pay. (I will be submitting you an updated report on the case at Nikomas in the coming days.)

COMPLAINT: LABOR CONTRACTS
The union reports that all of the 4360 workers (count as of mid-December 2011) were on short-term contracts of 1-3 months in duration. It is my understanding that Nike only allows your suppliers to have a relative small percentage of short-term contract workers at your production plants. (Note: Your recent factory disclosure list states that there are only 685 workers at this factory producing Nike products. Can you confirm the accuracy of this number?)

DEMAND: LABOR CONTRACTS
Please confirm the allowable percentage of short-term contract workers at Nike factories. If the percentage of short-term contract workers at PT Sinar Timur Industrindo is, in fact, out of line with Nike’s standards, please require the factory to implement the standard percentage of full-time workers immediately.

COMPLAINT: ARBITRARY DISMISSALS (UNION BUSTING)
The union reports that on December 30, 2011, Mr. Zulkifli, the head of the human resources department at the factory, fired S. Setyabudi (Budi) and Arifudin (Arif) without cause.

On October 24, 2011, SPN committee members from PT Sinar met with the management to bring forth a request of their members. They submitted an oral request that on November 5, 2011, they did not want to work overtime because of the upcoming Muslim holiday on November 6, 2011

On November 1, 2011, they submitted a letter to the management with the same request.

The management did not reply to their written request.

On November 3, 2011, the SPN committee met with the management to get an answer to their letter. The manager from the HR department said, “no problem.” (i.e. The management would meet with the union committee.)

On November 5, 2011, almost the entire management team came to the IP section and during the change of shifts, Mr. Whyi ordered the supervisor (Syukur) to call all the workers back to work. The workers refused.

Then Mr. Whyi accused Arif of being a provocateur of this incident. He said, “You have to take responsibility, you are a provocateur and you have to be arrested.” Arif was then punched by Sarfudin from the SBSI committee. Then Mr. Choi told Mr. Whyi to detain Arif and call the police.

This was the beginning of the management’s anger towards the SPN union.

On November 7, 2011, the management invited the SPN committee to discuss the incident that occurred on November 5, 2011. The management said that the workers refusing overtime on November 5, 2011, had no basis in regulation, so the SPN committee should take responsibility for everything negative that transpired to date.

On November 8, 2011, one of the SPN committee members and a supervisor were demoted based on the allegation that they were “provocateurs.”

On November 28, 2011, the SPN committee members requested contract negotiations about short-term labor contracts. They assert that the current contract is not following the law. The delegation was led by Noviana Putri and included 13 workers. The management refused to negotiate.

On December 2, 2011, the SPN committee made a second request for contract negotiations about short-term contracts. But the management again refused saying SPN had no right to bargain with them.

On December 2, 2011, the SPN committee made a third request for a meeting with the management.

After three requests were refused, on December 3, 2011, the SPN committee asked for the Manpower Agency in Tangerang to mediate between the management and the workers’ delegation.

On December 20, 2011, the mediation was conducted by the Manpower Agency, but the agency said this issue should be solved in-house through negotiations by the management and the union.

On December 24, 2011, SPN sent a letter to request negotiations with the management. The meeting was confirmed for that day and then rescheduled for December 26, 2011.

On December 26, 2011, the scheduled meeting did not occur and the SPN committee sent an additional letter to request negotiations. The management did not respond.

On December 30, 2011, Mr. Zulkifli, the head of the human resources department at the factory, fired Budi and Arif without cause.

In relation to this chronology, the SPN committee reports that approximately 40 SPN union members have been dismissed without cause.

DEMAND: ARBITRARY DISMISSALS (UNION BUSTING)
Please have Setyabudi, Arifudin and the approximately 40 SPN union members who were dismissed without cause, reinstated immediately. The union can provide you with a list of these workers. If for some reason any of these workers will not be reinstated, please provide documentation as to the performance or disciplinary reasons for which they were terminated.

COMPLAINT: MEALS
The union reports that the quality of food that is served at the factory is terrible. One worker reported that one day he had to pick maggots out the rice that was served. He was disgusted, but he was so hungry that he ate the rice and got back to work. The union also reports that on many occasions they are not provided with adequate amounts of food. (Ex. If they are supposed to be given two eggs with lunch, they are only given one.) The union also reports that on many days, the food is not ready when their lunch break begins and they do not have enough time to eat their meal. Finally, the union reports that the meal allowance per worker is Rp.3.000 and that this amount is completely inadequate.

DEMAND: MEALS
Immediately demand that Mr. Choi develop and implement a plan of action to address the quality of the food; the amounts of food provided to workers so that it is in accordance with what workers have been promised; improving the timing of the meal being served to maximize the time workers have for their lunch break; and increase the meal allowance to at least Rp9.000 per worker (a simple meal of rice, vegetables and a piece of chicken at a local warteg costs Rp12.000).

COMPLAINT: BATHROOMS
The union reports that there are an inadequate number of bathrooms at the factory, resulting in long lines and very dirty conditions. The union also reports that Mr. Choi, the director of the factory, regularly enters both the men’s and the women’s room and bangs workers’ legs under the stalls with a bamboo pole in an attempt to hurry them along with their “business” and get them back on the production line.

DEMAND: BATHROOMS
Immediately demand that Mr. Choi develop and implement a plan of action to triple the amount of toilets at the factory; triple the amount of times that the toilets are cleaned each day; cease and desist with his practice of rousing workers with his bamboo pole while they are using the toilets.

COMPLAINT: WAGE INCREASE
The union reports that their current basic monthly wage of Rp.1.285.000 ($141) only covers their living expenses for half of the month. The workers shared that they are forced to live on credit for the other half of the month.

DEMAND: WAGE INCREASE
Immediately contract the Trade Union Rights Center to conduct an independent assessment of cost of living expenses for workers in this area. If the results of this assessment show that workers’ wages are not in line with meeting these basic expenses, workers must be given raises by Nike to meet the standard. This would bring the reality of workers’ wages in line with Nike’s public claim that workers are “Absolutely” paid a living wage, “no question about it.” (Nike Chairman, Phil Knight) And that workers wages “far surpass the regional or national minimum wages.” (Former Nike Director, Vada Manager)

COMPLAINT: BACK WAGES
The union reports that S. Setyabudi and Arifudin were not paid at all for their work in December 2011.

DEMAND: BACK WAGES
Immediately pay Setyabudi and Arifudin the money they are owed for their work from December 2011.

COMPLAINT: FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION
The union reports that workers are systematically discouraged from freely associating and discussing union matters at the factory.

DEMAND: FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION
Immediately conduct a training session for Mr. Choi and his management team about Nike workers’ right to freely associate. Also create and implement a mechanism by which workers can file complaints with Nike USA if their freedom to associate is violated by the management at the factory.

Posted in News

THE AUSTRALIAN: One-man crusade to end Nike sweatshops pays off

January 21st, 2012

By Peter Alford
The Australian
January 21, 2012

Anti-sweatshop activist Jim Keady talks to workers at PT SM Global factory. Picture: Revaldi

JIM Keady, anti-sweatshop activist, revolutionary Christian, former semi-pro goalie and continuing soccer nut, first tangled with Nike Inc 14 years ago.

As an assistant coach with St John’s University national championship soccer team — and a graduate theology student — he refused to wear the company’s emblem when the New York Catholic university accepted a $US3.5 million Nike sponsorship.

Keady’s coaching contract wasn’t renewed and his $11m freedom-of-expression lawsuit against Nike and St John’s was thrown out of court in 2000.

But the Swoosh also gained an implacable foe who last week dealt its expensively groomed Corporate Social Responsibility image a nasty blow.

Keady’s lone-hand activism over more than a decade against worker exploitation by Indonesian Nike supplier companies culminated in a ground-breaking agreement for PT Nikomas Gemilang to repay 4437 production workers Rp8.1 billion ($869,100) for almost 600,000 hours of forced, unpaid overtime.

Bambang Wirahyoso, chairman of the National Workers Union that Keady coached through the 11-month Nikomas campaign, described it as “potential shock treatment for Indonesia’s labour movement, the victory precedent”.

Bambang says more than 300,000 Indonesian workers, two-thirds women, are employed by contractors making globally branded footwear and clothing, in a system controversially pioneered by Nike from the 1970s in developing countries.

This week Keady spoke to workers at PT Sinar Timur in Tanggerang west of Jakarta, who told him they’d also been subjected to the practice known as jam molor (time delayed) and bullying. Keady had lived for a month in 2000 in the industrial satellite city with Nike production workers.

That sealed his commitment to a cause he now propagates through the Team Sweat campaign, funded mostly by fees from his “Behind the Swoosh” campus lecture tours back home.

“I am a one man operation on an $US80,000-a-year budget to take care of everything, going up against a $US20 billion corporation.”

Keady accuses supplier companies of wage-cheating, union-busting and routine bullying and Nike of refusing to take responsibility for workers in a system it created.

But that isn’t just Nike, he readily concedes. Many global footwear and clothing brands use Indonesian contract factories.

Nikomas’s massive footwear plant in Banten employs 60,000 people and runs production lines for adidas and Puma as well as Nike, and Keady says drily: “I really have a hard time believing this only impacts 4437 workers.”

He focuses on Nike, however, as it’s the biggest, with more than 30 per cent of the global athletic footwear market; because Indonesia is Nike’s largest supplier after China and Vietnam, and because Indonesian workers have freedom to organise.

“If I tried to do in China or Vietnam what I do here, I would be deported — at best,” says Keady. And when something like the Nikomas settlement happens to Nike “it sends shockwaves through the rest of the industry”.

The company has worked intensively to neutralise its “sweatshop” image, by corporate social responsibility programs and by requiring contractors to accept its stiffened codes of conduct and “leadership standard”.

In the recent case, Nike emphasised its role in investigating the allegations and in pressing PT Nikomas’s Taiwanese owner to reimburse workers and improve local management standards. Nike insists, however, that it cannot continuously and comprehensively monitor contract factories it does not own or manage.

The Weekend Australian asked if the company was examining its other 42 Indonesian suppliers for the malpractices found at Nikomas. We received a copy of Nike’s response to similar questions from an Indonesian magazine, which did not, however, answer our query.

Keady says he doesn’t talk much about the influence of his liberation theology Christianity on his work. “But I believe that if this guy, Jesus the revolutionary, were around in 2012 he might be in places like Tanggerang in the slums with the workers. So that’s what drives me.”

Posted in News

We won! Nike workers paid $1,000,000.00 in overtime cheating case

January 10th, 2012

dsc03455

Team Sweat:

I spent this afternoon meeting with Bambang Wirahoso, the Chairman of the Serikat Pekerja Nasional (SPN) – a trade union that represents tens of thousands of Nike factory workers in Indonesia. Our discussion centered on the case of forced overtime without pay at Nike’s PT Nikomas factory.

(CLICK HERE to learn more about the background on this case.)

I am now proud to report that following almost a year of investigation and negotiation, 4,437 Nike factory workers will be paid $1 million dollars for overtime they were forced to do without payment. The settlement between SPN and the factory management reflects 593,468 of unpaid overtime hours that workers put in sewing Nike sneakers at the plant during the past two years.

Workers will receive the money they are owed in two installments – the first on January 20th and the second on February 5th. And while workers are pleased with the result, in reality they are owed millions of dollars more. The practice of forcing workers to do overtime without pay was actually happening for 18 years, but Indonesian law only allows redress for the past two years.

Pak Bambang and I both agreed that the significance of this victory could go well beyond the Nike workers at Nikomas. This has the potential to send shockwaves through the Indonesian labor movement. Now that a precedent has been established, Bambang and the leadership at SPN are gearing up to take on the fight for the Adidas and Puma workers at Nikomas who also have been subjected to forced overtime without pay.

My friends, this is justice served. It took eleven months of hard work and we had to fight through denials and outright lies by the factory management, but the workers persevered and we won. We really won. We should savor this victory, but it is important to know that we have only just begun.

Peace,

Jim Keady

Posted in News

Dispatch from Indonesia: Right fight? Right target? Can we win? by Jim Keady

January 9th, 2012

slavery_if_the_shoe_fits

I spent 29 long hours traveling from my home in New Jersey to my second home, Indonesia.  I have come here to continue the fight I began 15 years ago.  A fight to get get the workers who make Nike products the justice they deserve - justice in the form of a living wage.

In the course of these 15 years, there have been times I have had my doubts.  Have I chosen the right fight?  Is Nike the right target?  Can we really win?

With regard to choosing the right fight… I have.  Rather, it was chosen for me.  I firmly believe that the God of justice, the God that stands on the side of the poor and oppressed, the God that cries out to the rich and powerful to humble themselves and love their neighbor - or in this case, their factory workers - this God has called me to be a warrior, to stay committed, and to see this calling through until victory or death.

With regard to my doubt of whether or not Nike is the right target, they are, of this, I am sure.

On my flight from Hong Kong to Jakarta, I met and spoke with two apparel company executives.  They were both buyers, middlemen between the factories and companies like Nike.  Both of these execs stated emphatically that the blame for the cause of the injustice that workers face - poverty wages - can and should be laid at the feet of the big brands; not the factories, not the buyers, but big brands like Nike.  They basically said that whatever Nike wants, Nike gets.  And what Nike wants in this case is to always cut costs and maximize profits, regardless of how this may impact human beings.  Going further, I firmly believe that the blame lay with Nike executives.  These cutthroat capitalists, these economic savages who worship at the altar of greed, do anything they must to maximize profits for Nike.  So, do I believe that Nike is the right target?  Absolutely.

Can we change this?  Can we really win?  The reality is that we are at war.  And through their horrifically exploitative actions, Nike has made themselves the enemy.  But in this war, our goal is not to destroy or punish the enemy.  Our goal is to love our enemy - with tough love.  We must continue to hold the raw truth of Nike’s greed right in their face.  Like loving family members who are intervening with a drug addict, we must tell the executives at Nike the truth and show them the pain and suffering they are causing.  And most importantly, we must show them a way out.

But what is the way out?  It is simple.  Nike must pay all their factory workers a living wage. Period.  Is this unrealistic?  Maybe.  Is it idealistic?  Possibly.  But will it happen?  Can we really win?  Yes.  Plain and simple, yes.

Posted in News

Subscribe Unsubscribe